Playboy’s Sex Research

When I first caught word of the sex research that is featured in this June’s issue of Playboy, as a sex researcher, I was skeptical.

In the June 2011 issue of Playboy, you’ll find the results of the 2011 Playboy Sex Survey. This survey was last conducted in 1983. If you want to check out details of their results, you can do so here and here.

A lot of the coverage of this survey has been criticizing their methodology and sample. However, once I looked into this, they actually didn’t do so bad. And I’m a tough critic. In fact, I was so skeptical that I emailed the research director and asked for more details. When I received a response (within hours, at that), I was pleasantly surprised to see the detail and care that went into this survey. They sent me specifics about how they weighed the data to match population stats in addition to a whole folder on bias in sex research. Nothing new to me, but still, an impressive and speedy response.

There are two surveys: The Playboy Reader Sex Survey and The Playboy/Harris Sex Survey. The Playboy Reader Survey is certainly not representative, though they don’t claim it to be. It is, as it sounds, a survey of readers of Playboy and their sexual behaviors, attitudes, and preferences. The Harris Sex Survey is the same thing, but with a sample of American adults (not just Playboy readers). Both had a specific emphasis on the role that technology played in sex and sexuality. They’ve really visualized their data in an interesting way, and now that I know the details of the study, I can take it seriously (despite the Playboy name).

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Desire: Money or Sex?

Funny, I’m writing a post for Kinsey Confidential and looking for a picture to accompany my post. When I googled “desire” the first five pages of hits were of money.

Really?

I hadn’t realized, until now, how much money really competes with sex in terms of what people desire.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Virginity Curve

A male friend and I have been talking about virginity loss lately. I have a theory about being a virgin…the desirability only lasts so long. Like this handy graph I made:

Sure, as a teen or even into your early 20s, one might find virginity to be something to be proud of “taking”. You often hear of it as a bragging right. However, once you hit 23 or 24, I think it becomes a negative in the dating world. There comes an age where holding on to virginity may actually deter potential partners.

It is 2011, we are beyond the world of waiting until marriage. In fact, those who wait for marriage tend to need sex therapy more than those who get to know their sexual compatibility with their partner before they take the plunge into marriage. Sex is a huge part of a relationship – it is the only thing that sets your partner apart from your roommate – so why would you wait to see if it clicks until after the papers are signed?

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Advice…From A Five Year Old

This little girl knows what she’s talking about: 5 year old needs a job before getting married

She clearly has a strong mother (or father) who is instilling the importance of independence into her little self… “if he says, I will not come back to you, fine! I will find a different man!” says the 5-year old. She doesn’t care if she gets married. She must not be watching the Disney line of films that instill the idea of being rescued by a prince and living happily ever after. She will live happily ever after as long as she has her dream job — not her dream man!

I hope this is an indication of the mentality of the next generation of kids.

Thanks to Robin Milhausen who posted this hilarious clip.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Romantic Regrets

Do you have curiosities about a former flame? Someone you thought it could have gone further with but maybe the timing just wasn’t right? I certainly have…and we’re not alone. In fact, a large portion of Americans report feeling regret about these curiosities.

An interesting study was recently released from researchers at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management. It isn’t often that I cite studies that come from a business school…but this is an exception. This business professor, Neal Roese, wanted to know what the typical American regretted the most in life. He unexpectedly found that the biggest regret had to do with love and relationships.

It was a nationally representative phone survey of 370 adults who were asked to describe one regret in detail including the time in which the regret happened and whether the regret was based on action or inaction.

  • Overall, 18.1% of respondents cited romantic regret as their primary regret. This is followed by family (15.9%), education (13.1%), and career (12.2%)
  • Women reported more romantic regret than men (44% versus 19% respectively)
  • Men reported more work-oriented regret than women (34% versus 27% respectively)

Asking yourself “what could have been?”can be a useful exercise but it is important to ensure there is a limit to how much you dwell on it. Participants who had regrets about something they didn’t act on (inaction regrets) tended to hold on to the regret for longer time. I’ve written a little more about the psychological implications of this on Kinsey Confidential, so check it out here.

I think the age of these respondents is important. In speaking with some friends about this issue, we decided that in a few years, perhaps regrets would be more prominent for “the one who got away” depending on whether we end up finding some version of “the one” or not. Perhaps the older you get, you might compare what you’ve got (or don’t have) with what you think you could have had.

You’re making a decision based on risks and benefits by passing up someone who you might consider to have “gotten away”. For some of us, that risk is quite calculated. I guess in a few years if I haven’t found someone, I might look back at the few men who I think of as “the ones who [might have] got away” with a bit of regret. But right now, it is more with intrigue. It will be interesting to revisit this post when I get to my “scary age” to see how I feel about it then.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Kinsey, Uncategorized

Desire Discrepancy: Consider the Context

Sexual desire discrepancy – when one member of the couple has lower sexual desire than the other. How often is it that you find a partner that has the exact same level of sexual desire to you? And if you are lucky enough to find that person, how often is it that both of your levels of sexual desire ebb and flow together? I can answer that. And the answer is never.

I’ve been dedicating a good portion of my research agenda to studying sexual desire and how it changes over the course of long term relationships. Sure, I’ve encountered couples who think they have the same level of sexual desire at the beginning of their relationship, but I’ve come to the conclusion that a lot of that “similarity talk” has more to do with their infatuation with how perfect they believe their relationship to be. Afterall, perception is everything.

I was recently recognized at a conference for my work in the area of sexual desire discrepancy, and myself and a friend/colleague (those are the best kind :)) at University of Guelph have submitted a manuscript on the topic that is under its second round of review.

The whole idea of considering sexual desire in the context of the couple is incredibly important. How can you possibly say that one person has low sexual desire when you haven’t considered them in the context of the sexual relationship? This is done all the time when diagnosing women (and I say women because most of the time women are pathologized – yet, in my sample women and men were equally likely to be the partner with low desire). And if a drug for low sexual desire in women is ever approved, you can imagine how much more often this diagnostic mistake will be made.

18 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Sexual Compatibility

A lot of the work I did for my first masters degree was in the area of sexual compatibility. My master’s thesis looked to examine the extent to which your perceived sexual compatibility and your compatibility of turn ons and turn offs with your partner impacted satisfaction. Fascinating…I loved it.

I’m still really curious when it comes to sexual compatibility. There are so many dimensions to sexual compatibility: perceived, physiological, likes/dislikes, etc. (I’m sure there are more). Most research uses the idea of perceived sexual compatibility – that is, the extent to which you think you are sexually compatible with your partner. Some say that perception is everything…

I’m currently working on my first book (I say first because I hope there are more books in my future…though time will tell). It is on sexual compatibility! I’m writing the Good in Bed guide to Sexual Compatibility. And I hope to include excerpts from couples about what sexual compatibility is to them.

So, with the many different definitions of sexual compatibility floating around, I’m asking for my readers to tell me what they think makes them sexually compatible (or incompatible) with their partner?

What factors impact sexual compatibility for you?

1 Comment

Filed under Good In Bed

Happy International Women’s Day

Happy International Women’s Day! This post is women-related. Obviously.

A few minutes ago, I was having some breakfast while watching the ladies of The View talk about the human sexuality professor at Northwestern, Michael Bailey, and the live sex show that he staged to teach the class how female orgasm works. If you haven’t read about it, where have you been? And you can read about it here, and here, and here (among other places).

I was pretty interested to hear their opinion, and was pleasantly surprised with the majority of the reactions. However, one thing rubbed me the wrong way, especially in light of today being International Women’s Day. Joy Behar questioned the importance of learning/teaching about female ejaculation (I’ll link to it once it is up). She asked “why do we need to know more or teach about [female ejaculation]?”

Well, Joy, how about because we know about 8 times more about male ejaculation than we do about female ejaculation? How about because women have been routinely excluded from medical studies until recently? There has long been an assumption that if it worked for men, it would work for women. And how about because, even today, women struggle to be represented in research studies (e.g.: heart health or alcoholism)?

When it comes to sexuality, we know even less about women. We know minimal about the anatomy of women’s genitals in comparison to men’s. We still struggle to understand the g-spot and the clitoris. The first comprehensive study of the anatomy of the clitoris was released in 2005 and found that the paired bulbs and paired corpora (which are continuous with the crura) are a part of the clitoris and appear to be the locus of female sexual function and orgasm. So the clitoris is far larger than ever before known. The crura (the ‘roots’ of the clitoris) are only recently being discovered as incredibly interconnected with the rest of the organs in the genital area. One fascinating study, using sonography, found that the g-spot orgasm may actually be the stimulation of the crura and the richly innervated clitoris (and this was just published in 2009).

Clearly, we are lacking in our knowledge of women’s sexual anatomy and function. We know far less about women’s sexual functioning than we do about men’s. So, Joy, that is why it is important to understand female orgasm and ejaculatory responses. And in light of Women’s Day (and every day), let’s acknowledge that although women have come far, there is still a long way to go before the sentence “women and men are treated equally” can be uttered in truth. Today is the 100th birthday of International Women’s Day – here are some ways to celebrate using social media.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

A Naked Therapist: Yea, That’ll Work

Oh, the things you can find on the internet these days. I mean, really, any desire you have could be satisfied just by knowing how to use our dear friend Google. So, you’re looking for a therapist. You decide that you should google therapists in your area, you know, just to check it out. To your surprise, you come across a Naked Therapist…

Actually, this wouldn’t be that surprising…but it would be surprising to know that this Naked Therapist is Sarah White, a woman who is practicing therapy, calling herself an actual therapist (she is not certified as a therapist, she is a computer programmer and self-proclaimed “psychology buff”), marketing herself as a therapist, and charging clients $150/hr for her “services”. Does she really expect to be taken seriously?

I actually think this service could be useful for men who are shy around women, and who are uncomfortable around a naked female body – a flooding therapy of sorts. But, really, how often are the men who are contacting her for services actually looking for therapy, and how many are looking to just get off on the idea of it all…

She claims that her clients (entirely marketed toward men) “gain power through arousal” – now this I have a bit of a problem with. Clearly she has never picked up a feminist piece of work in her life. And she has a whole lot to learn about arousal. She constructs 21st century men to be living a schizophrenic existence. Give men a bit of agency, won’t you?

So many questions…so many thoughts. How do the partners of men who seek her “therapy” feel about this — do they know — what are the implications of that? I would love to know what readers think about this, let’s discuss…thoughts?

I’m all for a woman’s right to sell her body as a service – you go girl – just don’t call it therapy. Call it what it is – glorified interactive online porn.

It should be noted that there is a great therapist finder through AASECT where you can find certified, real, fully clothed therapists in your area.

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Sexual Communication – No, Not Dirty Talk

I’ve done a bit of research on sexual communication…I find it really interesting that a lot of couples have a really hard time communicating about sex. I mean, really, what makes you more than just a roommate or friend to your partner? Sex does! Without sex, you might as well just be good friends who happen to live together.

In the research I’ve done so far, sexual communication appears to be more important than non-sexual communication in predicting sexual and relationship satisfaction. So, if you can communicate with your partner about sex, you will be more satisfied! Sounds good, right?

I wrote an article for Fox this week that provides tips to improving sexual communication with your partner. You can check it out here.

When I say you need to engage in sexual communication, I don’t mean you need to dirty talk to your partner, nor do I mean that you need to touch each other more often (although both of those are likely good too). What I mean is that you need to verbally express your sexual likes and dislikes to your partner outside of the bedroom.

You’d be surprised (or maybe not) how many couples aren’t doing this simple thing that can bring them closer to satisfaction. Out of the blue, send your partner a text or email throughout the day and let them know your favorite sexual position. Doing little things like that will help to open the conversation up to include sex talk (even if it is mediated through technology).

Whenever I’m teaching about relationships or sexual problems or sexual satisfaction (or anything to do with human sexuality, really), I always feel like I’m being so repetitive by telling my students “communication is key”. It might feel repetitive, but it really is true. And it is important not to neglect sexual communication as a separate construct in this message. So, today, I think you should go home and tell your partner something you like about sex. Just do it. See how it feels…

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized